Compare tool
Compare models side by side
Pick two to four models. The best figure in each row is marked, and every number comes from the maker, NEEP or ENERGY STAR. Copy the URL to share a comparison.
All mini-splits & heat pumps ranked →All dehumidifiers ranked →All window, wall & room units ranked →All heating ranked →All parts, tools & supplies ranked →
| Spec | Honeywell TPFIT32WK 32 Pint | Midea 35 Pint Dehumidifier (MAD35C1AWS-A) |
|---|---|---|
| Photo |  |  |
| Our score | SCORE5.3 / 10 | Not reviewed yet |
| Our take | A 32-pint unit with a 9.9-pint tank and no pump, from a licensee that's out of business, and it usually costs more than a Cube 50. We'd pass. | The bigger bucket model for a very damp room or small basement: 36.71 pints at IEF 2.01, about 15% less power per pint than the 22. No pump. |
| Capacity (DOE 65°F) | 32.46 pt/day | 36.71 pt/day |
| Efficiency (IEF) | 2.01 L/kWh | 2.01 L/kWh |
| Lowest operating temp | 41°F | n/a |
| Built-in pump | No | No |
| Bucket | 9.9 pints | n/a |
| Noise (maker figure) | 49 dBA | 49 dBA |
| Type | Portable | Portable |
| Warranty | 1 yr | n/a |
| ENERGY STAR | Yes | Yes |
| Watch out for | The licensee that made and backed these units says it's out of business; claims now go through a Honeywell Store form that excludes unauthorized sellers, and we can't confirm the Amazon seller is authorized. Honeywell's spec table lists a second capacity labeled 2019 DOE Standard (70 pints on the 50PWK, 48 on the 32WK). That label is backwards; shop on the ENERGY STAR figure. Honeywell's pages claim ENERGY STAR Most Efficient; ENERGY STAR's data says certified, not Most Efficient. The TPFIT32AWK is the Wi-Fi version; the 32WK has no app. | The -A model differs from the older MAD35C1AWS; Midea's Canada page lists R410a, which conflicts with ENERGY STAR's HFC-32. |
| More | Model detailsOur full reviewView on Amazon → | Model detailsOur full reviewView on Amazon → |